Former President Donald Trump stated on Saturday that the Russian-prepared proposal for peace constituted "not my final offer", following fierce backlash from Ukraine's leaders and commentators who compared it to the Munich pact of 1938 between Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler.
During short comments at the White House, Trump informed journalists: Our goal is to achieve peace. This should have occurred earlier … we are attempting to conclude it, one way or the other it must be resolved."
US and Ukrainian officials will meet in Geneva on Sunday for discussions on this proposal. Security officials from France, Britain and Germany are expected to join these negotiations in Geneva.
Prior to the talks, American lawmakers told media outlets that State Department head Marco Rubio contacted them during his travel to Geneva to clarify the nature of the leaked plan. He said, the proposal did not originate from the administration but instead reflected Russian desires, as reported by Senator Angus King, who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
However, Trump has given Volodymyr Zelenskyy until Thursday for signing the 28-point document. The document requires Ukraine to give up land it currently controls to Russia, downsize the size of its army, and relinquish long-range weapons. Additionally, it excludes international peacekeepers and penalties for Russian war crimes.
In a sombre address on Friday, Zelenskyy warned that Ukraine confronts a difficult decision in the near future between preserving the nation's honor and losing a major partner like the United States. Zelenskyy acknowledged that it faces one of the most difficult moments historically.
In comments on Saturday, Zelenskyy emphasized that real or "dignified" resolution depends on "guaranteed security and justice". He announced a negotiating team, established through a decree, which will meet American representatives in Geneva, headed by top aide Andriy Yermak.
A additional delegate of the Ukrainian delegation, ex-defense head and national security council secretary Umerov, stated they will hold consultations with the US "on the possible parameters of a future peace agreement".
Suggesting red lines, Umerov noted: "Ukraine approaches this process with a clear understanding of its interests. This represents a continuation of recent discussions focused on harmonizing our plans for future actions."
The Ukrainian president has attempted to participate positively with the US administration apparently intent to end the conflict based on Russian conditions. He has emphasized he cannot give up Ukraine’s sovereignty or disregard a constitution that enshrines Ukraine's territorial integrity.
During a summit in South Africa, G20 leaders and the European Council released a joint statement opposing the proposed deal, saying it needs "additional work". It said that members of the EU and NATO would need to be consulted on some of its provisions, which rule out Kyiv’s Nato membership and put conditions on its European Union membership.
Ukrainian reaction to the text, drawn up by a Russian representative and Trump’s representative, have been largely negative. Commentators argued it outlined a plan for further Russian aggression: not only of Ukraine but of other parts of Europe as well.
Mustafa Nayyem, a public figure who led the 2014 Maidan protests, remarked it drew comparisons with Chamberlain’s infamous Munich deal. The proposal came from a similar category, with the victim invited "to formulate his own defeat so everyone else can live easier".
In a Facebook post, Nayyem expressed he was outraged by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. It was an insult those who sought shelter in Bucha or Mariupol – sites of civilian executions – and for those whose children had been forcibly deported to Russian territory. A deeply cynical deal, he concluded.
In an interview in a Kyiv subway station, Sariskyi, a young adult, commented that Russia has attempted to dominate Ukraine "for years". The agreement offered very little in the Trump agreement and maintained troops in Ukraine. In my view, this deal aims to undermine Ukraine and impose unfair terms, he said.
Should Ukraine accept the terms Kyiv would be forced to give up its freedoms, he added. If it didn’t, the US would most likely break off cooperation and intelligence sharing, a vital resource of battlefield information for Ukraine's forces. "There is no good way out of this for now," he remarked.
Another passenger, 19-year-old Barchan, said that the country would "keep strong" without American support. "We will fight for as long as it takes. Our territory will remain our territory, including Crimea and the east. They are Ukrainian land." She said that the president is intelligent and forecasted he would not cede territory.
Speaking during rainfall, near a historical monument, Ivanovna mentioned she was grateful to the former US leader for his peace-making efforts. She said that Ukraine ought to consider ceding certain regions temporarily if it meant keeping America as a partner. "President Zelenskyy should hold a referendum and ask the people," she said.
Previous European leaders have roundly condemned this proposal. Finland’s former prime minister Sanna Marin called it a catastrophe, affecting not just Ukraine but for "all of the democratic world". She warned if Western nations display vulnerability – as it did in 2014 when Putin annexed Crimea – "more aggression and conflicts" could arise.
Belgium's ex-PM, Verhofstadt, referenced Churchill’s definition of an appeaser as someone who accommodates an aggressor. He continued: Trump aligns with Putin. Europe faces a choice between compromise and principles. A critical juncture for the European Union."
A tech enthusiast and software developer with over 10 years of experience specializing in Windows systems and performance tuning.