Amid the widespread uncertainty surrounding the American military actions on Venezuela, the capture of leader Nicolás Maduro, and Donald Trump's announcement that the US will “manage” the country and “seize control of the oil”, one thing is clear – these actions create a profoundly disturbing precedent.
The United States possesses a dark record of interference, invasion and occupation in that part of the world, but the recent overnight operation marked its first major military attack on South American land. “The preeminence of America in this region is now beyond dispute,” Mr Trump declared.
The choice to militarily strike another state and abduct its leader – only a few days after he publicly sought an off-ramp – carries even broader implications. We all have reason to be worried.
Venezuelans have suffered under an oppressive, corrupt, and inept government under Mr Maduro, widely believed to have stolen the last election. They now face a future of deep insecurity. Mr Trump has remarked that Maduro's second-in-command, Delcy Rodríguez would comply with American demands, and rejected conservative dissident leader and Nobel prize-winner María Corina Machado as a credible successor.
However, Ms Rodríguez, now the acting leader, has so far struck a defiant tone – and other parts of the decapitated regime are considerably more radical.
A man who won power pledging to stop foreign wars now says he is “not afraid of boots on the ground”. Renaming the Department of Defense as the Department of War was not merely symbolic. He fails to perceive the world’s superpower as a global policeman; he is converting it into a rogue state.
He believes that the United States' strength permits it to do as it wishes with minimal cost: observe the military actions against Nigeria and Iranian installations. He promises that the oil resources of Venezuela means this new undertaking “will be financially free”.
George W. Bush launched the invasion of Iraq on a lie. But this action without legal basis came lacking any form of UN approval or congressional approval; Democrats were not even informed and say they were deliberately deceived in briefings. Mr Trump aims not merely to stretch international norms, but to obliterate them.
Put aside the message this sends to global powers like Russia and China, and consider the destination for America itself. While the raid reportedly killed 40 Venezuelans, including civilians, there were no American fatalities. Mr Trump’s increasing belief in his impunity will almost certainly fuel further adventurism.
It is widely rejected the excuse that this is concerning narcotics. Venezuela is only a small transit route for cocaine; Mr Trump recently exonerated the former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández for narcotics and arms offenses. Mr Trump himself has been explicit that he is motivated by the lure of oil as well as machismo, the worldview of key officials, and the desire for glory as domestic popularity wanes.
The global reaction, especially in Europe, has – with honourable exceptions – been surprisingly subdued. That’s not a result of Mr Maduro’s sins, but anxiety over Mr Trump’s wrath. The strong reaction from UN Secretary General António Guterres was welcome, but this episode highlights the UN's diminishing clout.
Mr Trump’s isolationist supporters at home could still pressure him to redirect his gaze inward – but escalating insurance prices, economic unhappiness and ongoing controversies make foreign conflicts more appealing.
It has been less than 12 months into his four-year term. Other governments may come to rue the day if they remain quiet at this juncture, considering the potential next target.
A tech enthusiast and software developer with over 10 years of experience specializing in Windows systems and performance tuning.